According to Mike: While burning my CPU.
>
> On Tue, 13 Oct 1998, Richard Adams wrote:
>
> > I commented all routing out, execpt localhost, one can then add what routes
> > one wants in another file called from rc.local, why rc.local? becuase its
> > the last file called by the system startup process.
> >
> I always assumed that rc.local was for local (ie not networky) things, and
> that it got executed even if the network was not brought up at boot time
> (completely system dependant of course). If this is the case, then it is
> not a good place for routing to go.
Its the last file in the chain, i did not say that i put routing in it, i
said i call another file "from" it. That file brings up the ax25/netrom
system which is the easiest way. Considering my default route "does not" go
via eth0 i HAVE to do routing after the "network" system is up, toher ise i
would need to edit all the sysV files to reflect accordingly.
Belive me, rc.local is the easiest place to do it from.
>
> --
> Mike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> "You are *so* lovely."
> "Yes."
> "Yes! And you take a compliment, too! I like that in a goddess."
>
--
Regards Richard.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
