I know this question has came up before in this group but I haven't seen any follow ups to it and would really like to get your opions on it. First I would like to say that this is not meant to start a flame war, second it is not meant to put any dis-resecpt on anypersons or orgs. The intro to this question is this, on debain mailing list and also on news sites you see a new patch to fix a security problem about once every 1-2 weeks, for/relating to the debian dis. I have hardly heard a pep for suse regrauding security patches/info for there dis. The question is this, is suse dis more security from the get-go, they did-it-right-the-first-time sort of thing, or is it debain hard at work fixing every little flaw they see, instead of makeing the fix in the next major version? Which is more secure and why? Not only will debain and suse , but it seems this way will debain and every other dis, (suse, redhat, slackware, etc). I'm not saying the other dis don't release patches/security info, but they seem to less than the debain team. It is cause debian has more people reading over the sources, or is it cause the suse team can work on it for 8 hours and day. Like I said I mean no dis-respect to any of the dis teams, I am just curious about these matters.
