Just for info, I deleted all but the NT partition (fortunately they were
empty) and re-created them with disk druid and hey presto...... down with
Win95's Fdisk!!!  :-)

Thanks to those who took the time to reply.

Ailwyn

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 15 May 1999 06:42
Subject: Re: Disk Druid Problem


>Reading between the lines, you have 4 primary partitions.  Not only is 4
>the limit for primary partitions on a drive, if you have any secondary
>partitions, one of the primary partitions must tell where they are, and
>cannot be used for anything else.  I don't know disk druid, but if it
>doesn't work for youm you can use fdisk or cfdisk.  I hope you haven't
>done anything with one of those partitions, because you need to delete
>one and use it to describe the secondary partitions.  If you haaave 4
>primary partitions, and tell fdisk to make a new one, it will tell you:
>
>witsend:~# fdisk
>
>Command (m for help): n
>You must delete some partition and add an extended partition first
>
>And that is, I fear, what you must do.
>
>Lawson
>   >< Microsoft free environment
>
>This mail client runs on Wine.  Your mileage may vary.
>
>
>On Fri, 14 May 1999, Ailwyn Burgess wrote:
>
>> All
>>
>> I'm trying to install RH 5.2 onto a machine and I've partitioned the
>6.4 GB
>> disk as follows:
>>
>> 2GB NTFS
>> 1GB FAT
>> 1GB FAT
>> 2GB Linux Native
>>
>> Disk druid is reporting 141 MB unallocated, but when I try and create a
>> Linux Swap partition of 127MB (I believe this is the largest possible
>size)
>> it refuses to allocate it saying "not enough primary".
>>
>> What does this mean and how can I remedy it?
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> Ailwyn
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>___________________________________________________________________
>You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
>Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com/getjuno.html
>or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]
>

Reply via email to