Hi,
On Sun, 02 May 2010 23:29:04 +0900, Jiro SEKIBA <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Here is the patch against linux-next tree.
> 
> Current s_volume_name has 16 bytes, which is too small as modern filesystem.
> 
> s_last_mounted resides just after s_volume_name and has 64 bytes.
> 
> s_last_mounted is historically came from ext2, but not used in nilfs2 at all.
> Deleting s_last_mounted member and merging that space with s_volume_name
> enlarge s_volume_name upto 80 bytes for volume label.
> 
> When user land tools see the old header for new disk, it will just ignore
> additional bytes stored in s_last_mounted.  While, old disk format has only
> 16 bytes label, it doesn't affects in case seeing the new header for old disk.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jiro SEKIBA <[email protected]>

Applied to the for-next branch.

Thank you!

Ryusuke Konishi

> ---
>  include/linux/nilfs2_fs.h |    3 +--
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/nilfs2_fs.h b/include/linux/nilfs2_fs.h
> index 6505c00..8c2c611 100644
> --- a/include/linux/nilfs2_fs.h
> +++ b/include/linux/nilfs2_fs.h
> @@ -207,8 +207,7 @@ struct nilfs_super_block {
>       __le16  s_segment_usage_size;   /* Size of a segment usage */
>  
>       __u8    s_uuid[16];             /* 128-bit uuid for volume */
> -     char    s_volume_name[16];      /* volume name */
> -     char    s_last_mounted[64];     /* directory where last mounted */
> +     char    s_volume_name[80];      /* volume name */
>  
>       __le32  s_c_interval;           /* Commit interval of segment */
>       __le32  s_c_block_max;          /* Threshold of data amount for
> -- 
> 1.5.6.5
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nilfs" in
> the body of a message to [email protected]
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nilfs" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to