nilfs_bmap_lookup and its variants are supposed to take a valid
pointer argument to return a block address, thus pointer checks in
nilfs_btree_lookup and nilfs_direct_lookup are needless.

Signed-off-by: Ryusuke Konishi <[email protected]>
---
 fs/nilfs2/btree.c  |    6 +-----
 fs/nilfs2/direct.c |    3 +--
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/nilfs2/btree.c b/fs/nilfs2/btree.c
index c81893a..c05586a 100644
--- a/fs/nilfs2/btree.c
+++ b/fs/nilfs2/btree.c
@@ -554,17 +554,13 @@ static int nilfs_btree_lookup(const struct nilfs_bmap 
*btree,
                              __u64 key, int level, __u64 *ptrp)
 {
        struct nilfs_btree_path *path;
-       __u64 ptr;
        int ret;
 
        path = nilfs_btree_alloc_path();
        if (path == NULL)
                return -ENOMEM;
 
-       ret = nilfs_btree_do_lookup(btree, path, key, &ptr, level);
-
-       if (ptrp != NULL)
-               *ptrp = ptr;
+       ret = nilfs_btree_do_lookup(btree, path, key, ptrp, level);
 
        nilfs_btree_free_path(path);
 
diff --git a/fs/nilfs2/direct.c b/fs/nilfs2/direct.c
index 3186130..324d80c 100644
--- a/fs/nilfs2/direct.c
+++ b/fs/nilfs2/direct.c
@@ -56,8 +56,7 @@ static int nilfs_direct_lookup(const struct nilfs_bmap 
*direct,
        if (ptr == NILFS_BMAP_INVALID_PTR)
                return -ENOENT;
 
-       if (ptrp != NULL)
-               *ptrp = ptr;
+       *ptrp = ptr;
        return 0;
 }
 
-- 
1.6.6.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nilfs" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to