Hi,
On Wed, 2 Mar 2011 11:13:32 +0100, dexen deVries wrote:
> The patch I've submited may be a wrong solution; perhaps instead the
> algorithm
> of nilfs_find_fs() (around lib/nilfs.c:179,211) should be improved.
>
> Regards,
Well, allowing directory pathname for nilfs commands seems a good idea
to me. Why not apply it to other commands except nilfs_cleanerd ?
I think you can simply the callsite of nilfs_open() just like follows:
char *dev = NULL, *dir = NULL;
...
stat(pathname, &statbuf);
if (S_ISDIR(statbuf.st_mode))
dir = pathname;
else
dev = pathname;
nilfs = nilfs_open(dev, dir, NILFS_OPEN_RDONLY);
...
Thanks,
Ryusuke Konishi
> --
> dexen deVries
>
> [[[↓][→]]]
>
> > how does a C compiler get to be that big? what is all that code doing?
>
> iterators, string objects, and a full set of C macros that ensure
> boundary conditions and improve interfaces.
>
> ron minnich, in response to Charles Forsyth
>
> http://9fans.net/archive/2011/02/90
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nilfs" in
> the body of a message to [email protected]
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nilfs" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
