On Tue, 22 May 2012 18:25:15 +0400, Vyacheslav Dubeyko wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I found that ns_mount_state field doesn't commented in the_nilfs
> structure. I simply add comment for ns_mount_state field.
> 
> With the best regards,
> Vyacheslav Dubeyko.

Thanks.  I will pick it up.

Ryusuke Konishi

> --
> From: Vyacheslav Dubeyko <[email protected]>
> Subject: [PATCH 1/1] nilfs2: add omitted comment for ns_mount_state
> field of the_nilfs structure
> 
> This patch adds omitted comment for ns_mount_state field of the_nilfs
> structure.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vyacheslav Dubeyko <[email protected]>
> ---
> diff --git a/fs/nilfs2/the_nilfs.h b/fs/nilfs2/the_nilfs.h
> index 1a588a3..7885bdb 100644
> --- a/fs/nilfs2/the_nilfs.h
> +++ b/fs/nilfs2/the_nilfs.h
> @@ -53,6 +53,7 @@ enum {
>   * @ns_sbwtime: previous write time of super block
>   * @ns_sbwcount: write count of super block
>   * @ns_sbsize: size of valid data in super block
> + * @ns_mount_state: file system state
>   * @ns_seg_seq: segment sequence counter
>   * @ns_segnum: index number of the latest full segment.
>   * @ns_nextnum: index number of the full segment index to be used next
> --
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nilfs" in
> the body of a message to [email protected]
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nilfs" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to