On Sun, 2012-10-14 at 22:08 +0200, Piotr Szymaniak wrote: > On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 06:55:59PM +0400, Vyacheslav Dubeyko wrote: > > > > So, it is clear that #359 segment is empty. Moreover, #357 segment doesn't > > contain ifile block with blkoff = 2 as I can see from dumpseg output. > > Currently, I know that #358 segment contains empty ifile block with blkoff > > = 2. It needs to find segment which contains not empty block of ifile for > > blkoff = 2. Could you share dumpseg output of all previous segments (for > > #358)? > > dumpseg of blocks 340 → 357 attached (I hope, the file is ~200KB). >
As I can see, checkpoints #1843 and #1819 contain ifile's block with blkoff = 2. Could you check state of blocks 719300 and 698817? If any of these blocks are not empty then, please, send the raw dump of non-empty block(s). Thanks, Vyacheslav Dubeyko. > Piotr Szymaniak. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nilfs" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
