Hi Ryusuke, On Thu, 2014-04-24 at 00:09 +0900, Ryusuke Konishi wrote:
[snip] > If we implement nilfs3 filesystem as a different instance like > ext2/3/4 series, the namespace of nilfs/features/revision will > conflict between nilfs2 and nilfs3. In reality of course, creating > nilfs3 is unlikely at present, but logically the above namespace > design looks incoherent. > > I now feel the namespace should be > > fs/nilfs2/xxxx > > In this case, it doesn't cause the confliction regardless whether > we add nilfs3 or not. > Yes, you are right. Now I see the issue. I agree that we need to use fs/nilfs2 namespace. Anyway, we need to have group fs/nilfs2/features for showing features that are supported by driver (for example, xattrs support and so on). Likewise features support can be configured by Kconfig. With the best regards, Vyacheslav Dubeyko. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nilfs" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
