On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 12:01:29PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Another users of buffer_heads bytes the dust.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <h...@lst.de>
> ---
>  fs/xfs/xfs_file.c  | 61 
> +++++++++++++++---------------------------------------
>  fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c | 11 ++++++----
>  2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
> index 62649cc..663634f 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
<>
> @@ -711,52 +704,32 @@ xfs_file_dax_write(
>       struct kiocb            *iocb,
>       struct iov_iter         *from)
>  {
> -     struct address_space    *mapping = iocb->ki_filp->f_mapping;
> -     struct inode            *inode = mapping->host;
> +     struct inode            *inode = iocb->ki_filp->f_mapping->host;
>       struct xfs_inode        *ip = XFS_I(inode);
> -     ssize_t                 ret = 0;
>       int                     iolock = XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL;
> -     struct iov_iter         data;
> +     ssize_t                 ret, error = 0;
> +     size_t                  count;
> +     loff_t                  pos;
>  
>       xfs_rw_ilock(ip, iolock);
>       ret = xfs_file_aio_write_checks(iocb, from, &iolock);
>       if (ret)
>               goto out;
>  
> -     /*
> -      * Yes, even DAX files can have page cache attached to them:  A zeroed
> -      * page is inserted into the pagecache when we have to serve a write
> -      * fault on a hole.  It should never be dirtied and can simply be
> -      * dropped from the pagecache once we get real data for the page.
> -      *
> -      * XXX: This is racy against mmap, and there's nothing we can do about
> -      * it. dax_do_io() should really do this invalidation internally as
> -      * it will know if we've allocated over a holei for this specific IO and
> -      * if so it needs to update the mapping tree and invalidate existing
> -      * PTEs over the newly allocated range. Remove this invalidation when
> -      * dax_do_io() is fixed up.
> -      */
> -     if (mapping->nrpages) {
> -             loff_t end = iocb->ki_pos + iov_iter_count(from) - 1;
> -
> -             ret = invalidate_inode_pages2_range(mapping,
> -                                                 iocb->ki_pos >> PAGE_SHIFT,
> -                                                 end >> PAGE_SHIFT);
> -             WARN_ON_ONCE(ret);
> -     }
> +     pos = iocb->ki_pos;
> +     count = iov_iter_count(from);
>  
> -     trace_xfs_file_dax_write(ip, iov_iter_count(from), iocb->ki_pos);
> +     trace_xfs_file_dax_write(ip, count, pos);
>  
> -     data = *from;
> -     ret = dax_do_io(iocb, inode, &data, xfs_get_blocks_direct,
> -                     xfs_end_io_direct_write, 0);
> -     if (ret > 0) {
> -             iocb->ki_pos += ret;
> -             iov_iter_advance(from, ret);
> +     ret = iomap_dax_rw(iocb, from, &xfs_iomap_ops);
> +     if (ret > 0 && iocb->ki_pos > i_size_read(inode)) {
> +             i_size_write(inode, iocb->ki_pos);
> +             error = xfs_setfilesize(ip, pos, count);

I think this should be xfs_setfilesize(ip, pos, ret)?  'count' and 'ret' are
the same in non-error cases, but in error cases where iomap_dax_rw() does some
work and then encounters an error, 'ret' could be smaller.  In error cases
like this using 'ret' instead of 'count' will also keep the value we use in
i_size_write() equal to what we write via xfs_setfilesize() because
iocb->ki_pos == pos+ret, not pos+count.

Aside from that, even though I'm sure you'll want a review from an XFS
developer:

Reviewed-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwis...@linux.intel.com>
_______________________________________________
Linux-nvdimm mailing list
Linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvdimm

Reply via email to