On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 2:47 PM, Linda Knippers <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Several problems. >>> That family is documented for RFIC 0x0201. >>> No NVDIMM-N platform supports that DSM family. >>> When platforms do support 0x0201, some will also support NVDIMM-N. Since >>> opcodes are not documented, how do would they not step on each other? >>> >>> I don't think that works at all. >>> >> >> I'm confused there is no correlation between FIC and DSM family, > > > Page 7 of version 1.3 of your DSM spec says: > > Platforms that have the _DSM interface implemented, as outlined in this > section, can support a NVDIMM region with Region Format Interface Code > (RFIC) of 0x0201. > > Other DSM documents reference RFIC 0x0101. > >> at least not one Linux enforces. > > > That is true, but FW developers aren't being as loose.
Yes, they are. We have 3 0x101 DSM families. _______________________________________________ Linux-nvdimm mailing list [email protected] https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvdimm
