On Tue, 2017-05-02 at 09:18 -0700, Dave Jiang wrote: > > On 05/01/2017 05:16 PM, Kani, Toshimitsu wrote: > > On Mon, 2017-05-01 at 16:33 -0700, Dave Jiang wrote: > > : > > > +EXAMPLES > > > +-------- > > > + > > > +Clear poison (bad blocks) for the provided device > > > +[verse] > > > +ndctl clear-error -f /dev/dax0.0 -s 0 -l 8 > > > + > > > +Clear poison (bad blocks) at block offset 0 for 8 blocks on > > > device > > > /dev/dax0.0 > > > + > > > +OPTIONS > > > +------- > > > +-f:: > > > +--file:: > > > +The device/file to be cleared of poison (bad blocks). > > > + > > > +-s:: > > > +--start:: > > > +The offset where the poison (bad block) starts for this > > > device. > > > +Typically this is acquired from the sysfs badblocks file. > > > + > > > +-l:: > > > +--len:: > > > +The number of badblocks to clear in size of 512 bytes > > > increments. The > > > +length must fit within the badblocks range. If the length > > > exceeds the > > > +badblock range or is 0, the command will fail. > > > > Actually, I am seeing '-l 0' works just like '-l 1'. > > Oh now I remembered that Vishal requested that no length does 1 block > clear. Do you want me to correct documentation or behavior?
What is the reason behind of his request? Thanks, -Toshi _______________________________________________ Linux-nvdimm mailing list [email protected] https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvdimm
