On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 02:49:31PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> Turn the macro into a static inline and rewrite the condition checks for
> better readability in preparation for adding another condition.
> 
> Cc: Jan Kara <[email protected]>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
> Cc: Ross Zwisler <[email protected]>
> Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <[email protected]>
> ---
>  include/linux/huge_mm.h |   35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>  1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/huge_mm.h b/include/linux/huge_mm.h
> index a3762d49ba39..c4706e2c3358 100644
> --- a/include/linux/huge_mm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/huge_mm.h
> @@ -85,14 +85,26 @@ extern struct kobj_attribute shmem_enabled_attr;
>  
>  extern bool is_vma_temporary_stack(struct vm_area_struct *vma);
>  
> -#define transparent_hugepage_enabled(__vma)                          \
> -     ((transparent_hugepage_flags &                                  \
> -       (1<<TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE_FLAG) ||                             \
> -       (transparent_hugepage_flags &                                 \
> -        (1<<TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE_REQ_MADV_FLAG) &&                   \
> -        ((__vma)->vm_flags & VM_HUGEPAGE))) &&                       \
> -      !((__vma)->vm_flags & VM_NOHUGEPAGE) &&                        \
> -      !is_vma_temporary_stack(__vma))
> +extern unsigned long transparent_hugepage_flags;
> +
> +static inline bool transparent_hugepage_enabled(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> +{
> +     if (transparent_hugepage_flags & (1 << TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE_FLAG))
> +             return true;
> +
> +     if (transparent_hugepage_flags
> +                     & (1 << TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE_REQ_MADV_FLAG))
> +             /* check vma flags */;
> +     else
> +             return false;
> +
> +     if ((vma->vm_flags & (VM_HUGEPAGE | VM_NOHUGEPAGE)) == VM_HUGEPAGE
> +                     && !is_vma_temporary_stack(vma))
> +             return true;
> +
> +     return false;
> +}

I don't think that these are equivalent.  Here is the logic from the macro,
with whitespace added so things are more readable:

#define transparent_hugepage_enabled(__vma)
(
        (
          transparent_hugepage_flags & (1<<TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE_FLAG)

          ||

          (
            transparent_hugepage_flags & (1<<TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE_REQ_MADV_FLAG)

            &&

            ((__vma)->vm_flags & VM_HUGEPAGE)
          )
        )
         
         &&

         !((__vma)->vm_flags & VM_NOHUGEPAGE)
         
         &&

         !is_vma_temporary_stack(__vma)
)

So, if the VM_NOHUGEPAGE flag is set or if the vma is for a temporary stack,
we always bail.  Also, we only care about the VM_HUGEPAGE flag in the presence
of TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE_REQ_MADV_FLAG.

I think this static inline is logically equivalent (untested):

static inline bool transparent_hugepage_enabled(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
{
        if ((vma->vm_flags & VM_NOHUGEPAGE) || is_vma_temporary_stack(vma))
                return false;

        if (transparent_hugepage_flags & (1 << TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE_FLAG))
                return true;

        if ((transparent_hugepage_flags &
                                (1 << TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE_REQ_MADV_FLAG))
                        && vma->vm_flags & VM_HUGEPAGE)
                return true;

        return false;
}

The ordering of the checks is different, but we're not using && or || to
short-circuit checks with side effects, so I think it is more readable and
should be fine.
_______________________________________________
Linux-nvdimm mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvdimm

Reply via email to