On Thu 27-07-17 16:06:37, Ross Zwisler wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 03:12:40PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> > Add 'sync' argument to dax_iomap_fault(). It will be used to communicate
> > the fact that synchronous fault is requested.
> 
> I don't actually think you need to pass this 'sync' parameter around.  I think
> you can completely rely on IOMAP_F_NEEDSYNC being set in iomap.flags.  The DAX
> fault handlers can call ops->iomap_begin() and use that flag for all the
> tests and make it our once source of truth.
> 
> That flag also tells us that we are doing a write fault (from
> ext4_iomap_begin()):
> 
>       if ((flags & IOMAP_FAULT) && (flags & IOMAP_WRITE) && IS_SYNC(inode) &&
>           !jbd2_transaction_committed(EXT4_SB(inode->i_sb)->s_journal,
>                                       EXT4_I(inode)->i_datasync_tid))
>               iomap->flags |= IOMAP_F_NEEDDSYNC;
> 
> So conditionals like this from dax_iomap_pte_fault():
> 
>       force_ro = (vmf->flags & FAULT_FLAG_WRITE) && sync &&
>                       (iomap.flags & IOMAP_F_NEEDDSYNC);
> 
> can be simplified to:
> 
>       force_ro = (iomap.flags & IOMAP_F_NEEDDSYNC);

Yeah, probably you're right. I'll look into changing this.

                                                                Honza

-- 
Jan Kara <[email protected]>
SUSE Labs, CR
_______________________________________________
Linux-nvdimm mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvdimm

Reply via email to