The rw_page() interface doesn't provide a clear performance benefit for
PMEM and has had a nonzero maintenance burden, so remove it.

Signed-off-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwis...@linux.intel.com>
Suggested-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.willi...@intel.com>
Suggested-by: Christoph Hellwig <h...@infradead.org>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <wi...@infradead.org>
---
 drivers/nvdimm/pmem.c | 21 ---------------------
 1 file changed, 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/nvdimm/pmem.c b/drivers/nvdimm/pmem.c
index f7099ada..f23c82d 100644
--- a/drivers/nvdimm/pmem.c
+++ b/drivers/nvdimm/pmem.c
@@ -182,26 +182,6 @@ static blk_qc_t pmem_make_request(struct request_queue *q, 
struct bio *bio)
        return BLK_QC_T_NONE;
 }
 
-static int pmem_rw_page(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t sector,
-                      struct page *page, bool is_write)
-{
-       struct pmem_device *pmem = bdev->bd_queue->queuedata;
-       blk_status_t rc;
-
-       rc = pmem_do_bvec(pmem, page, PAGE_SIZE, 0, is_write, sector);
-
-       /*
-        * The ->rw_page interface is subtle and tricky.  The core
-        * retries on any error, so we can only invoke page_endio() in
-        * the successful completion case.  Otherwise, we'll see crashes
-        * caused by double completion.
-        */
-       if (rc == 0)
-               page_endio(page, is_write, 0);
-
-       return blk_status_to_errno(rc);
-}
-
 /* see "strong" declaration in tools/testing/nvdimm/pmem-dax.c */
 __weak long __pmem_direct_access(struct pmem_device *pmem, pgoff_t pgoff,
                long nr_pages, void **kaddr, pfn_t *pfn)
@@ -225,7 +205,6 @@ __weak long __pmem_direct_access(struct pmem_device *pmem, 
pgoff_t pgoff,
 
 static const struct block_device_operations pmem_fops = {
        .owner =                THIS_MODULE,
-       .rw_page =              pmem_rw_page,
        .revalidate_disk =      nvdimm_revalidate_disk,
 };
 
-- 
2.9.4

_______________________________________________
Linux-nvdimm mailing list
Linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvdimm

Reply via email to