On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 9:55 AM, Huaisheng Ye <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > ---- On Thu, 05 Jul 2018 00:48:40 +0800 Dan Williams > <[email protected]> wrote ---- > > On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 9:38 AM, Huaisheng Ye <[email protected]> wrote: > > > From: Huaisheng Ye <[email protected]> > > > > > > Changes since v1 [1]: > > > * Collect Jan's reviewed-by. > > > * According to Dan's suggestion, update the unit test infrastructure > > > tools/testing/nvdimm/pmem-dax.c for checking the validity of gfn. > > > > > > [1]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/7/4/81 > > > > > > --- > > > > > > Some functions within fs/dax don't need to get gfn from direct_access. > > > > Any reason you are calling it 'gfn'? I'm assuming that is a typo and > > it should be 'pfn'. > > Oh, sorry. > I made a mistake, it is a typo. I will correct it right now.
Don't worry about sending a new version. I'll fix it up when I apply the series. _______________________________________________ Linux-nvdimm mailing list [email protected] https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvdimm
