Dave Jiang <[email protected]> wrote: > A thought occurred to me. For password update, would it make sense to do > this instead: > 1. get the existing key by: request_key("nvdimm:xxxxxxxx") > 2. get the new key by: request_key("nvdimm.update:xxxxxxxx") > 3. verify key with hardware > on success, copy new payload to existing key payload > 4. invalidate "nvdimm.update" key > > This way then we won't have to mess with needing the invalidated key to > be garbage collected. Thoughts?
Can you tell me at what points you actually access the key? David _______________________________________________ Linux-nvdimm mailing list [email protected] https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvdimm
