On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 12:12:52PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> > The generic/081 regression appears to be a device-mapper issue...
>
> I'll see if this reproduces for me. Doesn't seem to be related to the DAX
> patches you caary though.
It does seem to be a DAX-specific failure though.
> > The generic/344 failure seems to be caused by a WARNING triggered in
> > the nvdimm code:
>
> OK, apparently this is nothing new for you as generic/344 fails for you
> even with 3.17. But it should not :). I'll try to see if I can reproduce
> this in my test setup during more test runs (I don't remember seeing it
> during occasional runs I do) and debug it further.
Thanks!
In case it wasn't clear, I wasn't planning on letting these failures
prevent the patches from going upstream. As you say, the generic/081
failure looks unrelated to ext4, and the generic/344 isn't a
regression.
- Ted
_______________________________________________
Linux-nvdimm mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvdimm
