On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 9:53 AM Borislav Petkov <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 08:20:38AM -0800, Dan Williams wrote: > > I recommended the split so the fixes can be tracked and / or reverted > > independently if they cause problems. > > Do you have anything concrete in mind that might go wrong or just a > general cautiousness?
Just general cautiousness, I'm not opposed to squashing them. > Or do you think the hw might not spit what mce_usable_address() is > checking for, for NVDIMM MCEs, so that you'd like to be able to revert > that second patch? mce_usable_address() should not have any sensitivity to NVDIMM vs DRAM MCEs. _______________________________________________ Linux-nvdimm mailing list [email protected] https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvdimm
