On 2019-05-01 5:01 p.m., Brendan Higgins wrote: > ## TLDR > > I rebased the last patchset on 5.1-rc7 in hopes that we can get this in > 5.2. > As I said on the last posting, I like this and would like to see it move forward. I still have the same concerns over the downsides of using UML (ie. not being able to compile large swaths of the tree due to features that don't exist in that arch) but these are concerns for later. I'd prefer to see the unnecessary indirection that I pointed out in patch 8 cleaned up but, besides that, the code looks good to me. Reviewed-by: Logan Gunthorpe <[email protected]> Thanks! Logan _______________________________________________ Linux-nvdimm mailing list [email protected] https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvdimm
- [PATCH v2 15/17] MAINTAINERS: add entry for KUnit the unit... Brendan Higgins
- Re: [PATCH v2 00/17] kunit: introduce KUnit, the Linux ker... Greg KH
- Re: [PATCH v2 00/17] kunit: introduce KUnit, the Linux ker... Logan Gunthorpe
- Re: [PATCH v2 00/17] kunit: introduce KUnit, the Linux ker... Frank Rowand
- Re: [PATCH v2 00/17] kunit: introduce KUnit, the Linu... Greg KH
- Re: [PATCH v2 00/17] kunit: introduce KUnit, the ... shuah
- Re: [PATCH v2 00/17] kunit: introduce KUnit, ... Frank Rowand
- Re: [PATCH v2 00/17] kunit: introduce KUnit, the ... Theodore Ts'o
- Re: [PATCH v2 00/17] kunit: introduce KUnit, ... Brendan Higgins
- Re: [PATCH v2 00/17] kunit: introduce KUnit, ... Frank Rowand
- Re: [PATCH v2 00/17] kunit: introduce KUn... Theodore Ts'o
- Re: [PATCH v2 00/17] kunit: introduc... Frank Rowand
- Re: [PATCH v2 00/17] kunit: introduce KUn... Brendan Higgins
