On Fri 05-07-19 13:47:02, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 5, 2019 at 12:10 PM Matthew Wilcox <wi...@infradead.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 04, 2019 at 04:27:14PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jul 4, 2019 at 12:14 PM Matthew Wilcox <wi...@infradead.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Jul 04, 2019 at 06:54:50PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> > > > > On Wed 03-07-19 20:27:28, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > > > > > So I think we're good for all current users.
> > > > >
> > > > > Agreed but it is an ugly trap. As I already said, I'd rather pay the
> > > > > unnecessary cost of waiting for pte entry and have an easy to
> > > > > understand
> > > > > interface. If we ever have a real world use case that would care for
> > > > > this
> > > > > optimization, we will need to refactor functions to make this
> > > > > possible and
> > > > > still keep the interfaces sane. For example get_unlocked_entry() could
> > > > > return special "error code" indicating that there's no entry with
> > > > > matching
> > > > > order in xarray but there's a conflict with it. That would be much
> > > > > less
> > > > > error-prone interface.
> > > >
> > > > This is an internal interface. I think it's already a pretty gnarly
> > > > interface to use by definition -- it's going to sleep and might return
> > > > almost anything. There's not much scope for returning an error
> > > > indicator
> > > > either; value entries occupy half of the range (all odd numbers between
> > > > 1
> > > > and ULONG_MAX inclusive), plus NULL. We could use an internal entry,
> > > > but
> > > > I don't think that makes the interface any easier to use than returning
> > > > a locked entry.
> > > >
> > > > I think this iteration of the patch makes it a little clearer. What do
> > > > you
> > > > think?
> > > >
> > >
> > > Not much clearer to me. get_unlocked_entry() is now misnamed and this
> >
> > misnamed? You'd rather it was called "try_get_unlocked_entry()"?
>
> I was thinking more along the lines of
> get_unlocked_but_sometimes_locked_entry(), i.e. per Jan's feedback to
> keep the interface simple.
So how about the attached patch? That keeps the interface sane and passes a
smoketest for me (full fstest run running). Obviously it also needs a
proper changelog...
Honza
--
Jan Kara <j...@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
>From 1aeaba0e061b2bf38143f21d054e66853543a680 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jan Kara <j...@suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2019 20:28:37 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] dax: Fix missed PMD wakeups
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <j...@suse.cz>
---
fs/dax.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/dax.c b/fs/dax.c
index fe5e33810cd4..3fe655d38c7a 100644
--- a/fs/dax.c
+++ b/fs/dax.c
@@ -191,15 +191,18 @@ static void dax_wake_entry(struct xa_state *xas, void *entry, bool wake_all)
__wake_up(wq, TASK_NORMAL, wake_all ? 0 : 1, &key);
}
+#define DAX_ENTRY_CONFLICT dax_make_entry(pfn_to_pfn_t(1), DAX_EMPTY)
/*
* Look up entry in page cache, wait for it to become unlocked if it
* is a DAX entry and return it. The caller must subsequently call
* put_unlocked_entry() if it did not lock the entry or dax_unlock_entry()
- * if it did.
+ * if it did. 'order' is the minimum order of entry to return. If there's no
+ * entry of sufficiently large order but there are some entries of lower order
+ * in the range described by xas, return special DAX_ENTRY_CONFLICT value.
*
* Must be called with the i_pages lock held.
*/
-static void *get_unlocked_entry(struct xa_state *xas)
+static void *get_unlocked_entry(struct xa_state *xas, unsigned int order)
{
void *entry;
struct wait_exceptional_entry_queue ewait;
@@ -210,6 +213,8 @@ static void *get_unlocked_entry(struct xa_state *xas)
for (;;) {
entry = xas_find_conflict(xas);
+ if (dax_entry_order(entry) < order)
+ return DAX_ENTRY_CONFLICT;
if (!entry || WARN_ON_ONCE(!xa_is_value(entry)) ||
!dax_is_locked(entry))
return entry;
@@ -254,7 +259,7 @@ static void wait_entry_unlocked(struct xa_state *xas, void *entry)
static void put_unlocked_entry(struct xa_state *xas, void *entry)
{
/* If we were the only waiter woken, wake the next one */
- if (entry)
+ if (entry && entry != DAX_ENTRY_CONFLICT)
dax_wake_entry(xas, entry, false);
}
@@ -461,7 +466,7 @@ void dax_unlock_page(struct page *page, dax_entry_t cookie)
* overlap with xarray value entries.
*/
static void *grab_mapping_entry(struct xa_state *xas,
- struct address_space *mapping, unsigned long size_flag)
+ struct address_space *mapping, unsigned int order)
{
unsigned long index = xas->xa_index;
bool pmd_downgrade = false; /* splitting PMD entry into PTE entries? */
@@ -469,20 +474,16 @@ static void *grab_mapping_entry(struct xa_state *xas,
retry:
xas_lock_irq(xas);
- entry = get_unlocked_entry(xas);
-
+ entry = get_unlocked_entry(xas, order);
+ if (entry == DAX_ENTRY_CONFLICT)
+ goto fallback;
if (entry) {
if (!xa_is_value(entry)) {
xas_set_err(xas, EIO);
goto out_unlock;
}
- if (size_flag & DAX_PMD) {
- if (dax_is_pte_entry(entry)) {
- put_unlocked_entry(xas, entry);
- goto fallback;
- }
- } else { /* trying to grab a PTE entry */
+ if (order == 0) {
if (dax_is_pmd_entry(entry) &&
(dax_is_zero_entry(entry) ||
dax_is_empty_entry(entry))) {
@@ -523,7 +524,11 @@ static void *grab_mapping_entry(struct xa_state *xas,
if (entry) {
dax_lock_entry(xas, entry);
} else {
- entry = dax_make_entry(pfn_to_pfn_t(0), size_flag | DAX_EMPTY);
+ unsigned long flags = DAX_EMPTY;
+
+ if (order > 0)
+ flags |= DAX_PMD;
+ entry = dax_make_entry(pfn_to_pfn_t(0), flags);
dax_lock_entry(xas, entry);
if (xas_error(xas))
goto out_unlock;
@@ -594,7 +599,7 @@ struct page *dax_layout_busy_page(struct address_space *mapping)
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!xa_is_value(entry)))
continue;
if (unlikely(dax_is_locked(entry)))
- entry = get_unlocked_entry(&xas);
+ entry = get_unlocked_entry(&xas, 0);
if (entry)
page = dax_busy_page(entry);
put_unlocked_entry(&xas, entry);
@@ -621,7 +626,7 @@ static int __dax_invalidate_entry(struct address_space *mapping,
void *entry;
xas_lock_irq(&xas);
- entry = get_unlocked_entry(&xas);
+ entry = get_unlocked_entry(&xas, 0);
if (!entry || WARN_ON_ONCE(!xa_is_value(entry)))
goto out;
if (!trunc &&
@@ -848,7 +853,7 @@ static int dax_writeback_one(struct xa_state *xas, struct dax_device *dax_dev,
if (unlikely(dax_is_locked(entry))) {
void *old_entry = entry;
- entry = get_unlocked_entry(xas);
+ entry = get_unlocked_entry(xas, 0);
/* Entry got punched out / reallocated? */
if (!entry || WARN_ON_ONCE(!xa_is_value(entry)))
@@ -1509,7 +1514,7 @@ static vm_fault_t dax_iomap_pmd_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf, pfn_t *pfnp,
* entry is already in the array, for instance), it will return
* VM_FAULT_FALLBACK.
*/
- entry = grab_mapping_entry(&xas, mapping, DAX_PMD);
+ entry = grab_mapping_entry(&xas, mapping, PMD_ORDER);
if (xa_is_internal(entry)) {
result = xa_to_internal(entry);
goto fallback;
@@ -1658,11 +1663,10 @@ dax_insert_pfn_mkwrite(struct vm_fault *vmf, pfn_t pfn, unsigned int order)
vm_fault_t ret;
xas_lock_irq(&xas);
- entry = get_unlocked_entry(&xas);
+ entry = get_unlocked_entry(&xas, order);
/* Did we race with someone splitting entry or so? */
- if (!entry ||
- (order == 0 && !dax_is_pte_entry(entry)) ||
- (order == PMD_ORDER && !dax_is_pmd_entry(entry))) {
+ if (!entry || entry == DAX_ENTRY_CONFLICT ||
+ (order == 0 && !dax_is_pte_entry(entry))) {
put_unlocked_entry(&xas, entry);
xas_unlock_irq(&xas);
trace_dax_insert_pfn_mkwrite_no_entry(mapping->host, vmf,
--
2.16.4
_______________________________________________
Linux-nvdimm mailing list
Linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvdimm
