On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 9:57 AM Dan Williams <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 4:43 AM Aneesh Kumar K.V > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > We should consider volatile regions synchronous so that we are resilient to > > OS crashes. This is needed when we have hypervisor like KVM exporting a > > ramdisk > > as pmem dimms. > > We have a hard time understanding what agent is being referenced when > we use "we" in a patch changelog. We would prefer that we consider not > using "we" in favor of explicitly named agents, or otherwise review > the changelog to make sure that "we" is clearly discernable. We will > fix it up this time when applying, but we hope we have made it clear > how confusing liberal use of "we" can be.
To be clear, I'm not strictly opposed to using "we" when it is established which we is being referred and stays constant throughout the description. This instance caught my eye again because the first couple "we"s seems to be the kernel, and the last we seems to be a user platform configuration. _______________________________________________ Linux-nvdimm mailing list [email protected] https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvdimm
