On Wed, 1 Apr 2020, Jan Kara wrote:
On Tue 31-03-20 21:46:39, Jules Irenge wrote:
Sparse reports a warning at wait_entry_unlocked()
warning: context imbalance in wait_entry_unlocked()
- unexpected unlock
The root cause is the missing annotation at wait_entry_unlocked()
Add the missing __releases(xa) annotation.
Signed-off-by: Jules Irenge <[email protected]>
---
fs/dax.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/fs/dax.c b/fs/dax.c
index 1f1f0201cad1..adcd2a57fbad 100644
--- a/fs/dax.c
+++ b/fs/dax.c
@@ -244,6 +244,7 @@ static void *get_unlocked_entry(struct xa_state *xas,
unsigned int order)
* After we call xas_unlock_irq(), we cannot touch xas->xa.
*/
static void wait_entry_unlocked(struct xa_state *xas, void *entry)
+ __releases(xa)
Thanks for the patch but is this a proper sparse annotation? I'd rather
expect something like __releases(xas->xa->xa_lock) here...
Honza
{
struct wait_exceptional_entry_queue ewait;
wait_queue_head_t *wq;
--
2.24.1
--
Jan Kara <[email protected]>
SUSE Labs, CR
Thanks for the kind reply. I learned and changed. If there is a further
issue, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Thanks,
Jules
_______________________________________________
Linux-nvdimm mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
