On Wed 01-04-20 16:33:59, Jules Irenge wrote:
> Sparse reports a warning at wait_entry_unlocked()
> 
> warning: context imbalance in wait_entry_unlocked() - unexpected unlock
> 
> The root cause is the missing annotation at wait_entry_unlocked()
> Add the missing __releases(xas->xa->xa_lock) annotation
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jules Irenge <jbi.oct...@gmail.com>

The patch looks good to me. You can add:

Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <j...@suse.cz>

                                                                Honza

> ---
>  fs/dax.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/dax.c b/fs/dax.c
> index 35da144375a0..ee0468af4d81 100644
> --- a/fs/dax.c
> +++ b/fs/dax.c
> @@ -244,6 +244,7 @@ static void *get_unlocked_entry(struct xa_state *xas, 
> unsigned int order)
>   * After we call xas_unlock_irq(), we cannot touch xas->xa.
>   */
>  static void wait_entry_unlocked(struct xa_state *xas, void *entry)
> +     __releases(xas->xa->xa_lock)
>  {
>       struct wait_exceptional_entry_queue ewait;
>       wait_queue_head_t *wq;
> -- 
> Change since v2
> - gives more accurate lock variable name
> 2.25.1
> 
-- 
Jan Kara <j...@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
_______________________________________________
Linux-nvdimm mailing list -- linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
To unsubscribe send an email to linux-nvdimm-le...@lists.01.org

Reply via email to