There are cases not covered by the original fix and cases added by the
latter patch.
Also there is one case of usage added without returning from the
function.
Fixes: ff434d87ccbd ("dimm: fix potential fd leakage in dimm_action()")
Fixes: 41a7e24af5db ("ndctl/dimm: Auto-arm firmware activation")
Signed-off-by: Michal Suchanek <[email protected]>
---
ndctl/dimm.c | 14 ++++++++++----
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/ndctl/dimm.c b/ndctl/dimm.c
index 09ce49e1d2ca..1c177b5494ec 100644
--- a/ndctl/dimm.c
+++ b/ndctl/dimm.c
@@ -1333,12 +1333,15 @@ static int dimm_action(int argc, const char **argv,
struct ndctl_ctx *ctx,
if (param.arm_set && param.disarm_set) {
fprintf(stderr, "set either --arm, or --disarm, not both\n");
usage_with_options(u, options);
+ rc = -EINVAL;
+ goto out_close_fout;
}
if (param.disarm_set && !param.disarm) {
fprintf(stderr, "--no-disarm syntax not supported\n");
usage_with_options(u, options);
- return -EINVAL;
+ rc = -EINVAL;
+ goto out_close_fout;
}
if (!param.infile) {
@@ -1351,13 +1354,15 @@ static int dimm_action(int argc, const char **argv,
struct ndctl_ctx *ctx,
if (!param.arm_set && !param.disarm_set) {
fprintf(stderr, "require --arm, or --disarm\n");
usage_with_options(u, options);
- return -EINVAL;
+ rc = -EINVAL;
+ goto out_close_fout;
}
if (param.arm_set && !param.arm) {
fprintf(stderr, "--no-arm syntax not
supported\n");
usage_with_options(u, options);
- return -EINVAL;
+ rc = -EINVAL;
+ goto out_close_fout;
}
}
actx.f_in = stdin;
@@ -1425,7 +1430,8 @@ static int dimm_action(int argc, const char **argv,
struct ndctl_ctx *ctx,
if (count > 1) {
error("write-labels only supports writing a single
dimm\n");
usage_with_options(u, options);
- return -EINVAL;
+ rc = -EINVAL;
+ goto out_close_fin_fout;
} else if (single)
rc = action(single, &actx);
}
--
2.26.2
_______________________________________________
Linux-nvdimm mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
