The revert appears in the 4.2.4 log as well, so it happened before 4.2 was 
released. From what I can see, that ti-st directory hasn't changed between 
4.2.4 and the 4.3.

-----Original Message-----
From: Grygorii Strashko [mailto:grygorii.stras...@ti.com] 
Sent: Monday, October 26, 2015 9:55 AM
To: Adam Ford <adam.f...@logicpd.com>; 'gigi.jos...@ti.com' 
<gigi.jos...@ti.com>; 'mar...@holtmann.org' <mar...@holtmann.org>; 
'devicet...@vger.kernel.org' <devicet...@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: 'Tony Lindgren' <t...@atomide.com>; 'linux-omap@vger.kernel.org' 
<linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>; Sekhar Nori <nsek...@ti.com>
Subject: Re: Question about TI Shared Transport

On 10/26/2015 03:58 PM, Adam Ford wrote:
> Gigi,
>
> I am working on modifying the DTS and DTSI files for the LogicPD Torpedo 
> which Tony added in Kernel 4.2
>
> There was a flurry of activity earlier this year regarding device tree 
> bindings for the shared transport and using the Bluetooth with it as seen 
> here:  https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/464777/
>
> I was able to get the Logic PD device to work with Bluetooth and the Shared 
> Transport using the instructions found 
> http://processors.wiki.ti.com/index.php/Shared_Transport_Driver#Device_Tree_kernel
>
> When I attempted to submit patches for the btwilink, the check script noted 
> that the documentation for btwlink and shared transport bindings were 
> missing.  It seems like there might be a new way to attach the BTWILINK to 
> the UART, but I wasn't sure if there was a better solution available yet.
>
> I also noticed that using the shared transport mechanism in 4.2.x worked, but 
> trying the same method in 4.3 resulted in a segmentation fault.  Does anyone 
> have any updated instructions for the proper way to use the BTWILINK?
>

It is not worked because OF support was reverted:
c0bd1b9 Revert "ti-st: add device tree support"


-- 
regards,
-grygorii
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to