* David Brownell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080415 09:54]:
> I've not been following these McBSP issues, but this
> comment suggests to me that the clock API is just not
> being used "correctly" here:
>
> On Tuesday 15 April 2008, Chandra shekhar wrote:
> > 1>
> > Clock structure can be moved to header file and create a structure.
> > So that instead of calling each clock by its name,( big problem for 2430
> > and 34xx
> > Which has 5 mcbsp instances) it can be called by Using mcbsp id.
> >
> > Something like this can be done...
> >
> > static char omap_mcbsp_ick[][12] = {"mcbsp1_ick\0",
> > "mcbsp2_ick\0",.........
> >
> > };
> >
> > static char omap_mcbsp_fck[][12] = {"mcbsp1_fck\0",
> > "mcbsp2_fck\0",.........
> > };
> >
> > static struct omap_mcbsp_clocks {
> > struct clk *ick;
> > struct clk *fck;
> > } omap_mcbsp_clk[OMAP_MAX_MCBSP_COUNT];
> >
> > clk_enable(omap_mcbsp_clk[id].ick);
> >
> > Clk_get or clk_enable/disable will be much simplified.
>
> The "correct" way to use the clock ACPI would be like:
>
> struct device *mcbsp = ... something ... ;
> struct clk *ick, *mck;
>
> ick = clk_get(mcbsp, "ick");
> fck = clk_get(mcbsp, "fck");
>
> That is, don't expect clients to use names like "mcbsp2_fck" and
> know which McBSP they're using ... just expect them to know
> they have *some* module, and that its clock has generic names
> such as "ick" and "fck".
>
> Of course, working that way may involve a bunch of other changes...
Yes, that's right the right clock should be found automatically based
on the clock name and instance number.
Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
