> +
> +static struct omap_mcbsp_platform_data omap2_mcbsp_pdata[] = {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP24XX
> + {
> + .virt_base = IO_ADDRESS(OMAP24XX_MCBSP1_BASE),
> + .dma_rx_sync = OMAP24XX_DMA_MCBSP1_RX,
> + .dma_tx_sync = OMAP24XX_DMA_MCBSP1_TX,
> + .rx_irq = INT_24XX_MCBSP1_IRQ_RX,
> + .tx_irq = INT_24XX_MCBSP1_IRQ_TX,
> + .ops = &omap2_mcbsp_ops,
> + .clk_name = "mcbsp_clk",
> + },
> + {
> + .virt_base = IO_ADDRESS(OMAP24XX_MCBSP2_BASE),
> + .dma_rx_sync = OMAP24XX_DMA_MCBSP2_RX,
> + .dma_tx_sync = OMAP24XX_DMA_MCBSP2_TX,
> + .rx_irq = INT_24XX_MCBSP2_IRQ_RX,
> + .tx_irq = INT_24XX_MCBSP2_IRQ_TX,
> + .ops = &omap2_mcbsp_ops,
> + .clk_name = "mcbsp_clk",
> + },
> +#endif
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP34XX
> + {
> + .virt_base = IO_ADDRESS(OMAP34XX_MCBSP1_BASE),
> + .dma_rx_sync = OMAP24XX_DMA_MCBSP1_RX,
> + .dma_tx_sync = OMAP24XX_DMA_MCBSP1_TX,
> + .rx_irq = INT_24XX_MCBSP1_IRQ_RX,
> + .tx_irq = INT_24XX_MCBSP1_IRQ_TX,
> + .ops = &omap2_mcbsp_ops,
> + .clk_name = "mcbsp_clk",
> + },
> + {
> + .virt_base = IO_ADDRESS(OMAP34XX_MCBSP2_BASE),
> + .dma_rx_sync = OMAP24XX_DMA_MCBSP2_RX,
> + .dma_tx_sync = OMAP24XX_DMA_MCBSP2_TX,
> + .rx_irq = INT_24XX_MCBSP2_IRQ_RX,
> + .tx_irq = INT_24XX_MCBSP2_IRQ_TX,
> + .ops = &omap2_mcbsp_ops,
> + .clk_name = "mcbsp_clk",
> + },
> +#endif
> +};
I guess Tony won't like this as it will break support for multi-omap.
Regards,
Anand
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
