Hello,

On Thu, 5 Jun 2008, Igor Stoppa wrote:

> - if a dvfs change is responsible of changing the rate supplied to a
> driver which asked it with clk_get_rate(), the dvfs transition has no
> reason to happen in case it would violate the constraints set by clock
> users.

There aren't any such constraints in the current tree.

clk_set_rate() is mostly only useful for code that doesn't expect the 
clock rate to be changed by other code.  Pre- and post-clk-rate-change 
notifiers should fix this for code that does need to know clock rates 
precisely.


- Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to