Op 30 jun 2008, om 19:49 heeft Felipe Balbi het volgende geschreven:
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 07:29:28PM +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:Op 30 jun 2008, om 13:50 heeft Felipe Balbi het volgende geschreven:Use platform_data to pass musb configuration-specific details to musb driver. It's easier to maintain in the sense that neither board will affect the other. For now tested on n800 only, wanna hear from everybody what guys think before test on omap3430sdp Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Tony Lindgre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: David Brownell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Anand Gadiyar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Kevin Hilman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Bryan Wu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-3430sdp.c | 75 ++++++++++++++- arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-n800-usb.c | 46 +++++++++- arch/arm/mach-omap2/usb-musb.c | 55 +++-------- arch/arm/mach-omap2/usb-tusb6010.c | 1 - drivers/usb/musb/musb_core.c | 37 +++---- drivers/usb/musb/musb_core.h | 14 +--- drivers/usb/musb/tusb6010.h | 169 -------------------------------- include/asm-arm/arch-omap/hdrc_cnf.h | 177 ---------------------------------- include/asm-arm/arch-omap/usb-musb.h | 6 +- include/linux/usb/musb.h | 38 +++++++- 10 files changed, 189 insertions(+), 429 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 include/asm-arm/arch-omap/hdrc_cnf.hWouldn't omap3-beagleboard.c and omap3-evm.c need a similar change?Yeah :-)but for now I only played with omap2. Omap3-based boards I'm still doing;-) That's why the patch is marked RFC.
I was wondering what would happen if I would test the patch on beagleboard, now I know :)
regards, Koen
-- Best Regards, Felipe Balbi [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blog.felipebalbi.com --To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux- omap" inthe body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
