On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 12:35:13AM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 12:19:16PM -0700, Steve Sakoman wrote:
> > ALSA sound/core/pcm_native.c:2573: BUG? (substream != ((void *)0))
>
> Hmmm... this looks odd.
>
> Jarkko, shouldn't that snd_assert() in pcm_native.c check if substream
> _is_ NULL instead of !is NULL ?
>
> I mean:
>
> diff --git a/sound/core/pcm_native.c b/sound/core/pcm_native.c
> index c49b9d9..db86090 100644
> --- a/sound/core/pcm_native.c
> +++ b/sound/core/pcm_native.c
> @@ -2570,7 +2570,7 @@ static int snd_pcm_playback_ioctl1(struct file *file,
> struct snd_pcm_substream *substream,
> unsigned int cmd, void __user *arg)
> {
> - snd_assert(substream != NULL, return -ENXIO);
> + snd_assert(substream == NULL, return -ENXIO);
> snd_assert(substream->stream == SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_PLAYBACK, return
> -EINVAL);
> switch (cmd) {
> case SNDRV_PCM_IOCTL_WRITEI_FRAMES:
>
> If you follow up the function calls, we can see that substream is
> initialized in pcm_native.c:snd_pcm_open_file():
>
> 2080 err = snd_pcm_open_substream(pcm, stream, file, &substream);
> 2081 if (err < 0)
> 2082 return err;
>
> and that initialized pointer is added to pcm_file in the same function
> a few lines later:
>
> 2089 pcm_file->substream = substream;
>
> Am I misreading something ? :-s
btw, the for loop in pcm.c:snd_pcm_attach_substream looks weird.
Couldn't it be changed to use list_for_each_entry() or any of its friends ?
797 for (substream =
pcm->streams[SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_CAPTURE].substream; substream; substream = substr
eam->next) {
--
balbi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
