"Rajendra Nayak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This patch adds the context save restore functions for GPIO
>
> Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
> arch/arm/plat-omap/gpio.c | 77
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/arm/plat-omap/include/mach/gpio.h | 19 +++++++-
> 2 files changed, 95 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> Index: linux-omap-2.6/arch/arm/plat-omap/gpio.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-omap-2.6.orig/arch/arm/plat-omap/gpio.c 2008-09-01
> 18:11:28.000000000
> +0530
> +++ linux-omap-2.6/arch/arm/plat-omap/gpio.c 2008-09-01 18:11:51.000000000
> +0530
> @@ -102,6 +102,7 @@
> #define OMAP24XX_GPIO_IRQSTATUS2 0x0028
> #define OMAP24XX_GPIO_IRQENABLE2 0x002c
> #define OMAP24XX_GPIO_IRQENABLE1 0x001c
> +#define OMAP24XX_GPIO_WAKE_EN 0x0020
> #define OMAP24XX_GPIO_CTRL 0x0030
> #define OMAP24XX_GPIO_OE 0x0034
> #define OMAP24XX_GPIO_DATAIN 0x0038
> @@ -1708,6 +1709,82 @@ void omap2_gpio_resume_after_retention(v
>
> #endif
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP34XX
> +static struct omap3_gpio_regs gpio_restore_banks[6];
Maybe we should have some consistency in naming the structures
which are used for context save/restore.
Here it's called 'restore bank', in other places 'ctx' etc.
Personally, I think context is more appropriate.
> +/* save the registers of bank 2-6 */
> +void omap3_gpio_save(void)
> +{
> + int i;
> + /* saving banks from 2-6 only */
> + for (i = 1; i < gpio_bank_count; i++) {
> + struct gpio_bank *bank = &gpio_bank[i];
> + gpio_restore_banks[i].gpio_sysconfig =
> + __raw_readl(bank->base + OMAP24XX_GPIO_SYSCONFIG);
> + gpio_restore_banks[i].gpio_irqenable1 =
> + __raw_readl(bank->base + OMAP24XX_GPIO_IRQENABLE1);
> + gpio_restore_banks[i].gpio_irqenable2 =
> + __raw_readl(bank->base + OMAP24XX_GPIO_IRQENABLE2);
> + gpio_restore_banks[i].gpio_wake_en =
> + __raw_readl(bank->base + OMAP24XX_GPIO_WAKE_EN);
> + gpio_restore_banks[i].gpio_ctrl =
> + __raw_readl(bank->base + OMAP24XX_GPIO_CTRL);
> + gpio_restore_banks[i].gpio_oe =
> + __raw_readl(bank->base + OMAP24XX_GPIO_OE);
> + gpio_restore_banks[i].gpio_leveldetect0 =
> + __raw_readl(bank->base + OMAP24XX_GPIO_LEVELDETECT0);
> + gpio_restore_banks[i].gpio_leveldetect1 =
> + __raw_readl(bank->base + OMAP24XX_GPIO_LEVELDETECT1);
> + gpio_restore_banks[i].gpio_risingdetect =
> + __raw_readl(bank->base + OMAP24XX_GPIO_RISINGDETECT);
> + gpio_restore_banks[i].gpio_fallingdetect =
> + __raw_readl(bank->base + OMAP24XX_GPIO_FALLINGDETECT);
> + gpio_restore_banks[i].gpio_dataout =
> + __raw_readl(bank->base + OMAP24XX_GPIO_DATAOUT);
> + gpio_restore_banks[i].gpio_setwkuena =
> + __raw_readl(bank->base + OMAP24XX_GPIO_SETWKUENA);
> + gpio_restore_banks[i].gpio_setdataout =
> + __raw_readl(bank->base + OMAP24XX_GPIO_SETDATAOUT);
> + }
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(omap3_gpio_save);
> +
> +/* restore the required registers of bank 2-6 */
> +void omap3_gpio_restore(void)
> +{
> + int i;
> + for (i = 1; i < gpio_bank_count; i++) {
> + struct gpio_bank *bank = &gpio_bank[i];
> + __raw_writel(gpio_restore_banks[i].gpio_sysconfig,
> + bank->base + OMAP24XX_GPIO_SYSCONFIG);
> + __raw_writel(gpio_restore_banks[i].gpio_irqenable1,
> + bank->base + OMAP24XX_GPIO_IRQENABLE1);
> + __raw_writel(gpio_restore_banks[i].gpio_irqenable2,
> + bank->base + OMAP24XX_GPIO_IRQENABLE2);
> + __raw_writel(gpio_restore_banks[i].gpio_wake_en,
> + bank->base + OMAP24XX_GPIO_WAKE_EN);
> + __raw_writel(gpio_restore_banks[i].gpio_ctrl,
> + bank->base + OMAP24XX_GPIO_CTRL);
> + __raw_writel(gpio_restore_banks[i].gpio_oe,
> + bank->base + OMAP24XX_GPIO_OE);
> + __raw_writel(gpio_restore_banks[i].gpio_leveldetect0,
> + bank->base + OMAP24XX_GPIO_LEVELDETECT0);
> + __raw_writel(gpio_restore_banks[i].gpio_leveldetect1,
> + bank->base + OMAP24XX_GPIO_LEVELDETECT1);
> + __raw_writel(gpio_restore_banks[i].gpio_risingdetect,
> + bank->base + OMAP24XX_GPIO_RISINGDETECT);
> + __raw_writel(gpio_restore_banks[i].gpio_fallingdetect,
> + bank->base + OMAP24XX_GPIO_FALLINGDETECT);
> + __raw_writel(gpio_restore_banks[i].gpio_dataout,
> + bank->base + OMAP24XX_GPIO_DATAOUT);
> + __raw_writel(gpio_restore_banks[i].gpio_setwkuena,
> + bank->base + OMAP24XX_GPIO_SETWKUENA);
> + __raw_writel(gpio_restore_banks[i].gpio_setdataout,
> + bank->base + OMAP24XX_GPIO_SETDATAOUT);
> + }
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(omap3_gpio_restore);
> +#endif
> +
> /*
> * This may get called early from board specific init
> * for boards that have interrupts routed via FPGA.
> Index: linux-omap-2.6/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/mach/gpio.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-omap-2.6.orig/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/mach/gpio.h
> 2008-09-01
> 18:11:28.000000000 +0530
> +++ linux-omap-2.6/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/mach/gpio.h 2008-09-01
> 18:11:51.000000000 +0530
> @@ -70,6 +70,22 @@
> IH_MPUIO_BASE + ((nr) & 0x0f) : \
> IH_GPIO_BASE + (nr))
>
> +struct omap3_gpio_regs {
> + u32 gpio_sysconfig;
> + u32 gpio_irqenable1;
> + u32 gpio_irqenable2;
> + u32 gpio_wake_en;
> + u32 gpio_ctrl;
> + u32 gpio_oe;
> + u32 gpio_leveldetect0;
> + u32 gpio_leveldetect1;
> + u32 gpio_risingdetect;
> + u32 gpio_fallingdetect;
> + u32 gpio_dataout;
> + u32 gpio_setwkuena;
> + u32 gpio_setdataout;
> +};
> +
Just a minor detail, but do we need the gpio_ prefix on all these names?
Since they are part of a struct named gpio_restore_banks, it leads to
lots of redundant 'gpio' names in the code.
> extern int omap_gpio_init(void); /* Call from board init only */
> extern int omap_request_gpio(int gpio);
> extern void omap_free_gpio(int gpio);
> @@ -80,7 +96,8 @@ extern void omap2_gpio_prepare_for_reten
> extern void omap2_gpio_resume_after_retention(void);
> extern void omap_set_gpio_debounce(int gpio, int enable);
> extern void omap_set_gpio_debounce_time(int gpio, int enable);
> -
> +extern void omap3_gpio_save(void);
> +extern void omap3_gpio_restore(void);
> /*-------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
>
> /* Wrappers for "new style" GPIO calls, using the new infrastructure
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
> the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
