> Sure, I'll update the patch. But if you look at patch 5/5, I'll need the
> structures to define the set_clock() function. Should I create then
> under <mach/omap_wdt.h> ??

I think that would be better - you are not creating a public general
interface to watchdogs but a specific interface between the OMAP platform
code and the OMAP watchdog.

Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to