On Wednesday 01 October 2008, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > So mirroring "at91_clock_associate()" ... maybe this
> > should be "omap_clock_associate()" not "clk_associate()".
> 
> Well, I'm ok with that but I'd rather see clk_associate() moving to
> clk api so anyone who needs that, could use it.

Seems like that's an "implementor's interface" rather
than a "user's interface".

So something like a "clock library" (duck!) might be
a good place for such a call... ;)

- dave

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to