> The general policy on comments is that they should not > be translating the C code into English. Not only are > such comments pointless (the C code says the same thing, > more precisely) but they also are more likely to become > obsolete as the code changes. (That's a well known > problem: comments usually don't get updated when the > code changes.)
Thanks for the info and point noted. :) > > So in my opinion we "should" not have this comment > just paraphrase (in English) what the code does, > one sentence per code block. > And now, I do agree. > (And then there's the way every SIH handler seems to > be getting its own irq_chip and handler thread. I'm > sure that can be done much better.) So, is there going to be a change in the current way, of spawning a separate thread, for power and gpio irqs? -- Jagadeesh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
