Hi Paul,
From: "ext Paul Walmsley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] [RFC] clk: introduce clk_associate
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 03:13:49 -0600 (MDT)
> Hello Hiroshi,
>
> On Tue, 14 Oct 2008, Hiroshi DOYU wrote:
>
> > I understood both points you explained below, while I still think that
> > standardizing clock names may be a little bit rigid.
>
> Perhaps you can help me understand - are you referring to the use of the
> TRM clocks, rather than creating a custom clock for each device driver?
> Or are you referring to the clock names used in the omap_clk_associate()
> calls?
This has been already solved since you suggested just to use more
shorter logical name, "ick" and "fck". It would be much cleaner;)
Hiroshi DOYU
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
