On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 12:05:13AM -0700, Paul Walmsley wrote: > Hello Russell, > > On Wed, 28 Jan 2009, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 01:22:22PM -0700, Paul Walmsley wrote: > > > Per rmk's preferences, some patches have been 'compressed.' That is, some > > > fix patches have been rolled into a single patch with the original. To > > > ease cross-referencing with the linux-omap git tree, original commit IDs > > > have been inserted into the patch messages. Also, what would have been > > > an > > > extremely long series has been split into six smaller, cumulative, > > > roughly > > > thematic patch series. If requested, I would be pleased to simply send > > > one large series of the original, uncompressed patches. Thanks to the > > > git > > > and stgit authors and contributors: without those tools, this process > > > would have been nearly impossible. > > > > Since this patch series was only really meant for me to do some follow-on > > work on it (to merge it into my tree) is it really necessary to submit > > this 70 patch series via slow email via several mailing lists? > > I posted the patches for final review and upstream merging. > > Not sure what the follow-on work is that you mention. But if it's > additional development work, such as modifying the linux-omap clock code > to use your recent clkdev code, that should really be discussed > separately, and patches posted for comment to linux-omap, so the OMAP > community has a chance to test it first. People on that list seem to be > pretty reasonable...
If that's what you thought I was offering, forget it. I wasn't. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
