Tony,

Has this patch been applied to the linux-omap tree? Does it need to go the 
patchwork?

Cf. http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=123141577308177&w=2

Regards,
Jean

On Thursday 08 January 2009 12:49:19 Jean Pihet wrote:
> Thanks for the suggestion, it works great (stress tested) and is a cleaner
> fix.
> Here is a patch the latest linux-omap-2.6 tree. Is this OK?
>
> Regards,
> Jean
>
> From d143f6b2e705aa4e9d2b032097fd1c82f8163262 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Jean Pihet <[email protected]>
> Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 12:35:21 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] OMAP: MMC: recover from transfer failures
>
> Timeouts during a command that has a data phase can result in the
> next command issued after the command that failed not being processed,
> i.e. no interrupt ever occurs to indicate the command has completed.
> This failure can result in a deadlock.
>
> This patch resets the data state machine to clear the error in
> case of a command timeout.
>
> Tested on OMAP3430 chip and intensive MMC/SD device removal while
> transferring data.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Lowe <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Jean Pihet <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c |    9 ++++++++-
>  1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c
> index d5c1e9d..97150c0 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c
> @@ -464,8 +464,15 @@ static irqreturn_t mmc_omap_irq(int irq, void *dev_id)
>                                 }
>                                 end_cmd = 1;
>                         }
> -                       if (host->data)
> +                       if (host->data) {
>                                 mmc_dma_cleanup(host);
> +                               OMAP_HSMMC_WRITE(host->base, SYSCTL,
> +                                       OMAP_HSMMC_READ(host->base,
> +                                                       SYSCTL) | SRD);
> +                               while (OMAP_HSMMC_READ(host->base,
> +                                               SYSCTL) & SRD)
> +                                       ;
> +                       }
>                 }
>                 if ((status & DATA_TIMEOUT) ||
>                         (status & DATA_CRC)) {
> --
> 1.5.4.4.21.gc4a6c
>
> On Thursday 08 January 2009 10:02:24 Adrian Hunter wrote:
> > Why not do the reset in mmc_omap_irq() like the other resets?
> > e.g.
> >
> > static irqreturn_t mmc_omap_irq(int irq, void *dev_id)
> > ...
> >                 if ((status & CMD_TIMEOUT) ||
> >                         (status & CMD_CRC)) {
> >                         if (host->cmd) {
> >                                 if (status & CMD_TIMEOUT) {
> >                                         OMAP_HSMMC_WRITE(host->base,
> > SYSCTL, OMAP_HSMMC_READ(host->base, SYSCTL) | SRC); while
> > (OMAP_HSMMC_READ(host->base, SYSCTL) & SRC) ;
> >
> >                                         host->cmd->error = -ETIMEDOUT;
> >                                 } else {
> >                                         host->cmd->error = -EILSEQ;
> >                                 }
> >                                 end_cmd = 1;
> >                         }
> > -                       if (host->data)
> > +                       if (host->data) {
> >                                 mmc_dma_cleanup(host);
> > +                               OMAP_HSMMC_WRITE(host->base, SYSCTL,
> > +                                       OMAP_HSMMC_READ(host->base,
> > +                                                       SYSCTL) | SRD);
> > +                               while (OMAP_HSMMC_READ(host->base,
> > +                                               SYSCTL) & SRD)
> > +                                       ;
> > +                       }
> >                 }
> >                 if ((status & DATA_TIMEOUT) ||
> >                         (status & DATA_CRC)) {


Reply via email to