Kevin Hilman <[email protected]> writes:
> Now that the generic IRQ and GPIO frameworks are used for enabling and
> disabling GPIO IRQ wakeup sources, there is no longer a need to call
> [enable|disable]_irq_wake() in the low-level code. Doing so results
> in recursive calls to [enable|disable]_irq_wake().
>
> This was discovered in the suspend/resume path on OMAP3/Beagle using
> the gpio-keys driver which disables/re-enables GPIO IRQ wakeups in the
> suspend/resume path.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <[email protected]>
Tony,
Not sure if it's too late, but this could go into omap-fixes too.
Kevin
> ---
> arch/arm/plat-omap/gpio.c | 14 ++++----------
> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/gpio.c b/arch/arm/plat-omap/gpio.c
> index f856a90..798a8cd 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/gpio.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/gpio.c
> @@ -837,13 +837,10 @@ static int _set_gpio_wakeup(struct gpio_bank *bank, int
> gpio, int enable)
> case METHOD_MPUIO:
> case METHOD_GPIO_1610:
> spin_lock_irqsave(&bank->lock, flags);
> - if (enable) {
> + if (enable)
> bank->suspend_wakeup |= (1 << gpio);
> - enable_irq_wake(bank->irq);
> - } else {
> - disable_irq_wake(bank->irq);
> + else
> bank->suspend_wakeup &= ~(1 << gpio);
> - }
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bank->lock, flags);
> return 0;
> #endif
> @@ -856,13 +853,10 @@ static int _set_gpio_wakeup(struct gpio_bank *bank, int
> gpio, int enable)
> return -EINVAL;
> }
> spin_lock_irqsave(&bank->lock, flags);
> - if (enable) {
> + if (enable)
> bank->suspend_wakeup |= (1 << gpio);
> - enable_irq_wake(bank->irq);
> - } else {
> - disable_irq_wake(bank->irq);
> + else
> bank->suspend_wakeup &= ~(1 << gpio);
> - }
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bank->lock, flags);
> return 0;
> #endif
> --
> 1.6.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
