"Peter 'p2' De Schrijver" <[email protected]> writes:
> Hi Kevin, > >> Peter, >> >> I like this approach much better than what we currently have. Pushing >> to PM branch. >> >> The next thing I would like to see is all the register value defines >> removed from prm-regbits-34xx.h. That header is supposed to be for >> the bitfield definitions, not for values. >> > > True. If this patch goes in, there is no need for the register value > defines in prm-regbits-34xx.h any more. > OK, I pushed a patch which removes them from regbits.h and moved some of the other value defines into pm34xx.c until a better place is found. Kevin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
