On Thu, Jan 02, 2014 at 05:49:38PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-01-02 at 15:12 +0000, Russell King wrote:
> > We can do much better with this by using a structure to describe each
> > register, rather than code.
> > 
> 
> One comment bellow.
> 
> 
> > Signed-off-by: Russell King <[email protected]>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm/mach-omap1/dma.c |  121 
> > +++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
> >  arch/arm/mach-omap2/dma.c |   99 ++++++++++++++++++-------------------
> >  include/linux/omap-dma.h  |   13 +++++
> >  3 files changed, 117 insertions(+), 116 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap1/dma.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap1/dma.c
> > index 11f0b0ee67a3..de30e28ff487 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap1/dma.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap1/dma.c
> > @@ -32,53 +32,52 @@
> >  
> >  #define OMAP1_DMA_BASE                     (0xfffed800)
> >  #define OMAP1_LOGICAL_DMA_CH_COUNT 17
> > -#define OMAP1_DMA_STRIDE           0x40
> 
> Does this belong to patch 19/26 ?

Why?

> >  static void __iomem *dma_base;
> >  static inline void dma_write(u32 val, int reg, int lch)
> >  {
> > -   u8  stride;
> > -   u32 offset;
> > +   void __iomem *addr = dma_base;
> >  
> > -   stride = (reg >= CPC) ? OMAP1_DMA_STRIDE : 0;
                                ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
The code here still uses it prior to this patch.

-- 
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: 5.8Mbps down 500kbps up.  Estimation
in database were 13.1 to 19Mbit for a good line, about 7.5+ for a bad.
Estimate before purchase was "up to 13.2Mbit".
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to