On 19/03/14 16:29, Pantelis Antoniou wrote: > Hi Tomi, > > On Mar 19, 2014, at 4:25 PM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > >> On 17/03/14 16:09, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I noticed that my omap4 panda does not boot with today's linux-next >>> (8808b950581f71e3ee4cf8e6cae479f4c7106405). I didn't have much time to study >>> it, but I didn't find any posts about the issue with a quick look. Below is >>> the crash. >> >> I bisected this to the commit: >> >> commit ad2c12e9bc250b3387bcb4ab9ab114f43ff6122f >> Author: Pantelis Antoniou <[email protected]> >> Date: Fri Dec 13 20:08:59 2013 +0200 >> >> of: device_node kobject lifecycle fixes >> >> After the move to having device nodes be proper kobjects the lifecycle >> of the node needs to be controlled better. >> >> At first convert of_add_node() in the unflattened functions to >> of_init_node() which initializes the kobject so that of_node_get/put >> work correctly even before of_init is called. >> >> Afterwards introduce of_node_is_initialized & of_node_is_attached that >> query the underlying kobject about the state (attached means kobj >> is visible in sysfs) >> >> Using that make sure the lifecycle of the tree is correct at all >> times. >> >> Signed-off-by: Pantelis Antoniou <[email protected]> >> [grant.likely: moved of_node_init() calls, fixed up locking, and >> dropped __of_populate() hunks] >> Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <[email protected]> >> > > Can you try this? It should fix it (plus it should be in -next soon)
Thanks, that fixes the issue (tested on omap4 panda). Tomi
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
