On Tuesday 29 April 2014 01:59:20 Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> This driver is also used by OMAP1. Even when disabling GPIO_OMAP on that
> platform doesn't cause a build error since no function defined in the driver
> is
> used directly by platform code, I think that we always want this driver on
> OMAP1
> too.
>
> > However, it seems entirely reasonable to include the driver in build tests
> > on other platforms, so we should also allow building it for COMPILE_TEST
> > builds and select the required GENERIC_IRQ_CHIP that may not already be
> > enabled on other platforms.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/Kconfig b/drivers/gpio/Kconfig
> > index c58b828..c8c42be 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpio/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/gpio/Kconfig
> > @@ -244,9 +244,10 @@ config GPIO_OCTEON
> > family of SOCs.
> >
> > config GPIO_OMAP
> > - bool "TI OMAP GPIO support"
> > + bool "TI OMAP GPIO support" if COMPILE_TEST && !ARCH_OMAP2PLUS
>
> So this should be:
>
> + bool "TI OMAP GPIO support" if COMPILE_TEST && !ARCH_OMAP2PLUS &&
> !ARCH_OMAP1
>
Well, if COMPILE_TEST is disabled on OMAP1, the option is already
hidden and enabled in my version. It seems reasonable to me to
allow compile-testing OMAP1 without the GPIO driver, while a kernel
running on OMAP1 should always have COMPILE_TEST disabled.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html