Hi Andreas,
2014-04-30 14:23 GMT+02:00 Andreas Müller <schnitzelt...@googlemail.com>:
> On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 9:40 AM, Andreas Fenkart <afenk...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> @@ -2201,11 +2346,16 @@ static int omap_hsmmc_suspend(struct device *dev)
>> pm_runtime_get_sync(host->dev);
>>
>> if (!(host->mmc->pm_flags & MMC_PM_KEEP_POWER)) {
>> - omap_hsmmc_disable_irq(host);
>> + OMAP_HSMMC_WRITE(host->base, ISE, 0);
>> + OMAP_HSMMC_WRITE(host->base, IE, 0);
>> + OMAP_HSMMC_WRITE(host->base, STAT, STAT_CLEAR);
>> OMAP_HSMMC_WRITE(host->base, HCTL,
>> OMAP_HSMMC_READ(host->base, HCTL) & ~SDBP);
>> }
>>
>> + if (host->wake_irq && !(host->mmc->pm_flags & MMC_PM_WAKE_SDIO_IRQ))
>> + disable_irq(host->wake_irq);
>> +
I think it says, "Do you want to wake up from deep power states when
an SDIO IRQ is pending"
Will try to bring this more to the point
>> if (host->dbclk)
>> clk_disable_unprepare(host->dbclk);
>>
>> @@ -2231,6 +2381,9 @@ static int omap_hsmmc_resume(struct device *dev)
>>
>> omap_hsmmc_protect_card(host);
>>
>> + if (host->wake_irq & !(host->mmc->pm_flags & MMC_PM_WAKE_SDIO_IRQ))
you're right should be '&&'
>> + enable_irq(host->wake_irq);
>> +
>> pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(host->dev);
>> pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(host->dev);
>> return 0;
> Maybe I misunderstand something here but shouldn't
> disable_irq/enable_irq be swapped here?
/Andreas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
