On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 2:53 PM, Sebastian Reichel <s...@kernel.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 02:06:47PM -0500, Nishanth Menon wrote:

>>  Optional properties:
>> -- ti,use_poweroff: With this flag, the chip will initiates an ACTIVE-to-OFF 
>> or
>> -                SLEEP-to-OFF transition when the system poweroffs.
>> +
>> +- ti,system-power-controller OR ti,use_poweroff: This indicates that
>> +  TWL4030 is the power supply master of the system. With this flag, the
>> +  chip will initiates an ACTIVE-to-OFF or SLEEP-to-OFF transition when
>> +  the system poweroffs.
>
> I suggest the following wording:
>
> - ti,system-power-controller: This indicates that TWL4030 is the
>   power supply master of the system. With this flag, the chip will
>   initiates an ACTIVE-to-OFF or SLEEP-to-OFF transition when the
>   system poweroffs.
>
> - ti,use_poweroff: Deprecated name for ti,system-power-controller

Yes, this does indeed sound better. if no one has a different opinion
or further comments, will update this patch tomorrow.

-- 
---
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to