Hello.
On 9/8/2014 6:10 PM, Roger Quadros wrote:
The SoC supports 2 DCAN nodes. Add them.
Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <[email protected]>
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7.dtsi | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 30 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7.dtsi
index 370009e..4ce1a4f 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7.dtsi
[...]
@@ -1267,6 +1269,34 @@
ti,irqs-skip = <10 133 139 140>;
ti,irqs-safe-map = <0>;
};
+
+ dcan1: d_can@481cc000 {
The ePAPR standard has something to say here:
>>
The name of a node should be somewhat generic, reflecting the function of the
device and not its precise programming model. If appropriate, the name should
be one of the following choices:
• can
>>
+ compatible = "bosch,d_can";
+ ti,hwmods = "dcan1";
+ reg = <0x4ae3c000 0x2000>,
+ <0x558 0x4>; /* index to RAMINIT reg within
syscon */
+ raminit-syscon = <&dra7_ctrl_core>;
+ raminit-start-bit = <3>;
+ raminit-done-bit = <1>;
+ raminit-pulse;
Hm, aren't the above 4 properties vendor specific? If so, they should
start with a vendor prefix and comma.
+ interrupts = <GIC_SPI 222 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
+ clocks = <&dcan1_sys_clk_mux>;
+ status = "disabled";
+ };
WBR, Sergei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
