On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 04:27:45PM -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote: > > On 10/27/2014 10:56 AM, Roger Quadros wrote: > > > Alternatively we could fix either elm_config() or omap_nand_probe() to > > return -EPROBE_DEFER in case the device is present but driver not yet > > probed. > > > > Yes, that's a good idea. Can't we do both? Getting a systematic deferred > probe sounds like a bit silly to me.
It may be. If we do both and something moves again, or something is added that depends on omap_elm but is probed earlier, you won't be noticing the new systematic probe deferral until you really start looking at it. There isn't a real dependency system in the drivers, is there? Thanks, Frans -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
