Hi Felipe,
I am seeing with this patch because of the timeout:
DSP device detected !!
DSPProcessor_Attach succeeded.
dspbridge: timed out waiting for mailbox
dspbridge: timed out waiting for mailbox
dspbridge: timed out waiting for mailbox
dspbridge: timed out waiting for mailbox
dspbridge: timed out waiting for mailbox
dspbridge: timed out waiting for mailbox
dspbridge: timed out waiting for mailbox
dspbridge: timed out waiting for mailbox
dspbridge: timed out waiting for mailbox
dspbridge: timed out waiting for mailbox
dspbridge: timed out waiting for mailbox
...
Did you see any issue when you change to 1ms? Maybe we can use a bigger timeout.
Please let me know your comments.
Regards,
Fernando.
-----Original Message-----
From: Felipe Contreras [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 7:27 PM
To: [email protected]
Cc: Kanigeri, Hari; Hiroshi DOYU; Ameya Palande; Guzman Lugo, Fernando; Felipe
Contreras
Subject: [PATCH B 3/3] tidspbridge: decreate timeout to a saner value
From: Felipe Contreras <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <[email protected]>
---
drivers/dsp/bridge/wmd/tiomap_sm.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/dsp/bridge/wmd/tiomap_sm.c
b/drivers/dsp/bridge/wmd/tiomap_sm.c
index 1b31162..535dc13 100644
--- a/drivers/dsp/bridge/wmd/tiomap_sm.c
+++ b/drivers/dsp/bridge/wmd/tiomap_sm.c
@@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ DSP_STATUS CHNLSM_InterruptDSP2(struct WMD_DEV_CONTEXT
*pDevContext,
pDevContext->dwBrdState = BRD_RUNNING;
}
- timeout = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(10);
+ timeout = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(1);
while (fifo_full((void __iomem *) resources.dwMboxBase, 0)) {
if (time_after(jiffies, timeout)) {
printk(KERN_ERR "dspbridge: timed out waiting for
mailbox\n");
--
1.6.2.1.287.g9a8be
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
