Hi Tero,

Tero Kristo <t-kri...@ti.com> writes:

> The new usage of determine_rate and set_rate_and_parent calls for
> OMAP DPLLs assumes the DPLLs must have two parents defined, even
> if it is the same clock. Legacy clock data did not fullfill this
> requirement and caused a boot crash. Fixed by adding the missing
> parent information to the DPLL clocks.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tero Kristo <t-kri...@ti.com>
> Fixes: 2e1a7b014f ("ARM: OMAP3+: DPLL: use determine_rate() and...")
> Cc: Kevin Hilman <khil...@kernel.org>

I tested this on linux-next (next-20141210, same version where I found
the bug) and this doesn't fix the boot problem. 

BTW, in testing this, I noticed that the OMAP clock code is still
spitting out compile warnings[1].  These should cleaned up too.

Kevin

[1]
../arch/arm/mach-omap2/cclock3xxx_data.c:263:2: warning: initialization from 
incompatible pointer type [enabled by default]
../arch/arm/mach-omap2/cclock3xxx_data.c:263:2: warning: (near initialization 
for 'dpll1_ck_ops.determine_rate') [enabled by default]
../arch/arm/mach-omap2/cclock3xxx_data.c:376:2: warning: initialization from 
incompatible pointer type [enabled by default]
../arch/arm/mach-omap2/cclock3xxx_data.c:376:2: warning: (near initialization 
for 'dpll4_ck_ops.determine_rate') [enabled by default]
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to