* Felipe Balbi <[email protected]> [150105 12:23]: > On Mon, Jan 05, 2015 at 02:10:14PM -0600, Dave Gerlach wrote: > > >> +static int wkup_m3_rpm_suspend(struct device *dev) > > >> +{ > > >> + return -EBUSY; > > >> +} > > > > > > looks like this is just coping with omap_device bogosity, no ? > > > > > > > Yes, without this omap_device shuts down ther wkup_m3 during suspend, which > > of > > course prevents the wkup_m3 from finishing suspend process or waking SoC > > back > > up. Haven't found a better solution for the problem than this. > > Tony, any better for this ? Do we keep this small hack or find a better > way ?
Looks OK to me for now, later on we may want to have a flag for HWMOD_NEVER_IDLE or something similar for wkup_m3_hwmod. But let's not add more dependencies to this series. Regards, Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
